Senior Data Engineer Interview Questions That Matter

10 Important Senior Data Engineer Interview Questions

Can you describe how the B+ tree indexing structure works in databases, and why it might be chosen over other types of index structures like Hash Indexes or Bitmap Indexes?

Why is this question asked?

This question is asked to test your understanding of index structures in databases. It gauges your knowledge of B+ tree indexing, how it functions, and why one might choose it over other indexing methods, given the appropriate context.

Example answer:

The structure of a B+ tree index is a balanced tree in which each path from the root of the tree to a leaf node is of the same length. Each non-leaf node in the tree contains a number of keys and pointers. The keys act as separation values which divide its subtrees.

For example, if a node contains the values [10, 20, 30] it has four child nodes: one for values less than 10, one for values between 10 and 20, one for values between 20 and 30, and one for values greater than 30.

The leaf nodes of the tree contain the indexed data entries and are linked in a sort of doubly linked list. This means that the tree can be traversed in two ways: top-down (starting from the root) and left-right (along the leaf nodes).

The top-down traversal is used for exact match and range queries, while the left-right traversal allows efficient processing of sorted data.

Now, the reason why one might choose a B+ tree index over, say, a hash index or a bitmap index depends on the nature of the data and the queries that are frequently run on it.

Hash indexes are particularly efficient for exact match queries but not so much for range queries. They map keys to values using a hash function, which is great for quick lookups but doesn't maintain any sort order of the data.

In contrast, B+ tree indexes are ideal for both exact match and range queries, as they maintain the data in sorted order.

Bitmap indexes, on the other hand, are best suited for low-cardinality data, where a column has a few distinct values.

For example, a gender column that only has 'Male' and 'Female' values. Bitmap indexes would not be ideal for high-cardinality data because they can take up a lot of space and reduce efficiency. Therefore, for high-cardinality data, a B+ tree index might be a better choice.

So, essentially, the choice between a B+ tree, hash, or bitmap index will pretty much depend on the nature of the data and the type of queries that the database needs to support.

Why is this answer good?

• Detailed Explanation: The candidate offers a comprehensive explanation of the B+ tree index and how it functions.

• Comparison with Other Indexes: The candidate clearly differentiates between B+ tree, hash, and bitmap indexes.

• Contextual Understanding: The candidate demonstrates an understanding of when to use each type of index based on the nature of the data and the requirements of the database.

• Practical Examples: The candidate uses relatable examples to explain complex concepts, making the answer more understandable.

In a Red-Black Tree, what are the properties that maintain the balance during insertions or deletions?

Why is this question asked?

This question tests your knowledge of advanced data structures, specifically Red-Black Trees.

Understanding the properties that maintain balance in these trees is crucial for efficient insertions, deletions, and lookups — fundamental operations in many computer science applications.

Example answer:

Red-Black Trees are a type of self-balancing binary search tree, where each node has an extra attribute: color, either red or black.

This color attribute is fundamental to ensuring the tree remains approximately balanced during insertions and deletions.

To maintain this balance, Red-Black Trees follow five key properties:

• Node Coloring: Every node is either red or black. The color attribute is primarily used to help balance the tree.

• Root Node: The root node is always black. This rule doesn't influence the balancing of the tree but is a constant property that simplifies the analysis of the tree algorithms.

• Leaf Nodes: All leaves (NULL or NIL nodes) are black. These NIL nodes are used as the leaves of the actual tree nodes and typically contain no data.

• Red Node Children: If a node is red, then both its children are black. This rule prevents the creation of consecutive red nodes in any path from a given node down to its descendant leaves, which would violate the tree's balance.

• Black Depth: Every path from a node to its descendant leaves contains the same number of black nodes. This property, often referred to as the "Black Depth" property, is the key to the tree's balance. It ensures that there are no paths in the tree that are more than twice as long as any other, maintaining the tree's near-perfect balance.

When we insert or delete nodes in the Red-Black Tree, these operations might violate the Red-Black properties.

To ensure our tree stays balanced, we need to restore these properties with a set of rotation and color-flipping operations called "Recoloring" and "Rotations".

The specific actions taken depend on the relationships between the newly inserted or deleted node and its relatives, but in all cases, the goal is to restore the Red-Black Tree properties while keeping the disruption to the tree's structure minimal.

Why is this answer good?

• Comprehensive Coverage: The answer thoroughly explains all the properties of Red-Black Trees and their role in maintaining balance.

• Correction Measures: The candidate explains what measures are taken when these properties are violated, showing a deep understanding of the operations on Red-Black Trees.

• Practical Applications: The candidate touches on the usage of Red-Black Trees, linking theory with practice.

• Clarity and Structure: The answer is well-structured and presents complex concepts in a clear, understandable way.

Discuss the data modeling for a time-series database. How does it differ from conventional relational database modeling?

Why is this question asked?

The idea here is to assess your understanding of time-series databases, which have become increasingly crucial with the rise of IoT devices and real-time analytics.

The question tests whether you grasp the fundamental differences between time-series and traditional relational databases and can design an appropriate data model for each.

Example answer:

Time-series databases (TSDB) are specifically optimized for handling time-series data, data points indexed in time order.

They're used extensively in fields such as IoT, financial data analysis, and system monitoring where time-stamped data is generated continuously. Data modeling for a time-series database significantly differs from that of conventional relational databases.

In a time-series database, the primary index is time. Data points typically consist of time-stamped records, and queries are often to retrieve records over a specific period.

Therefore, TSDBs are typically optimized for fast data ingestion and complex queries across large datasets with a temporal focus.

The data model often involves a series key (a combination of a measurement name and a set of tag key-value pairs), a timestamp, and a set of field key-value pairs. InfluxDB is a popular example of a TSDB.

Unlike TSDBs, traditional relational databases model data into tables, where each row is an entry and each column represents a specific attribute of that entry. The relational model involves defining tables, fields, relationships, indexes, functions, and procedures.

The primary purpose of a relational database is not just to store data but to retrieve it in various ways without having to reorganize the database tables.

Queries in relational databases can be quite complex and involve several tables, and the structure tends to be more static.

The significant difference in the data modeling of TSDBs and relational databases stems from their fundamentally different use cases. TSDBs excel in scenarios where massive amounts of data are ingested, and the queries are time-based.

On the other hand, relational databases are excellent for transactional data and complex queries that are not necessarily time-based.

So, while both types of databases have their strengths and weaknesses, the choice between the two comes down to the specific requirements of the data, the nature of the queries to be made, and the speed and scalability needs of the system.

Why is this answer good?

• Clear Comparisons: The answer clearly highlights the differences between time-series databases and traditional relational databases.

• Real-World Relevance: The candidate draws upon practical examples like IoT and financial data analysis, showing their understanding of the real-world applications.

• Detailed Explanation: The answer provides in-depth information about the structure and functionality of both database types.

• Consideration of Use Case: The candidate considers the choice between the two types of databases from a use-case perspective, showing their ability to apply theoretical knowledge practically.

Can you describe the process of writing a custom MapReduce job to process a large dataset? What are the key components involved?

Why is this question asked?

This question is asked to evaluate your understanding of the MapReduce paradigm, a crucial aspect of working with big data.

It tests your ability to design, implement, and optimize MapReduce jobs, which is essential for processing and analyzing large datasets efficiently.

Example answer:

I think I’ll explain it better with an example:

So, let’s say we’re calculating the average length of sentences in a large text corpus. MapReduce model is a good choice because of the large-scale text processing which can be parallelized.

The first step is to write the Mapper function. In our case, the Mapper takes input as key-value pairs, where the key is the document name and the value is the text within the document.

The Mapper processes the text, calculating the length of each sentence and outputting key-value pairs of the form ("Sentence", length).

Next, we write the Reducer function. The input to the Reducer is the key and a list of all values associated with that key from the Mapper output.

So, for each key ("Sentence"), the Reducer will receive a list of all sentence lengths. It can then calculate the average length by summing the list and dividing by the number of elements.

The Mapper and Reducer are the core components of a MapReduce job. However, they are not all. We also need a Driver, which configures and controls the MapReduce job.

The Driver specifies various parameters, like the input and output data formats, the classes containing the map and reduce functions, and the types of the intermediate and final key-value pairs. It also controls job submission and monitors job progress.

In terms of writing the code, you'd typically use Hadoop MapReduce in Java, or you could use a Hadoop-compatible language like Python with Hadoop Streaming.

For our problem, you'd need to handle text parsing in the Mapper, calculating sentence lengths, and dealing with edge cases like sentences that span multiple lines.

The Reducer is relatively straightforward, just calculating an average, but you'd want to ensure it correctly handles cases like empty input or division by zero.

Optimization is also crucial with MapReduce jobs. Techniques might include using Combiners (which are mini-reducers that run on the output of the Mapper, on the same node, before the shuffle phase) to reduce network I/O, tuning the number of map and reduce tasks, and adjusting Java heap space settings for Hadoop.

Why is this answer good?

• Process Explanation: The answer provides a comprehensive walkthrough of the MapReduce job creation process.

• Practical Example: The candidate uses a real-world text processing example to illustrate the MapReduce process, showing their ability to apply theoretical knowledge.

• Mention of Optimization: By mentioning job optimization, the candidate shows their awareness of performance considerations in big data processing.

• Acknowledgment of Variations: Discussing the use of different programming languages shows the candidate's understanding of the variety of tools available for implementing MapReduce.

How would you handle schema evolution in a data lake storing large volumes of Parquet or Avro files?

Why is this question asked?

This question is asked to gauge your understanding of schema evolution, a crucial aspect of data management in big data systems.

Your answer should reveal your expertise with data storage formats like Parquet and Avro and your approach towards handling changes in schema over time in a data lake environment.

Example answer:

Both Parquet and Avro offer capabilities for managing schema evolution, but they handle it in different ways.

Avro, being a row-based format, is schema-on-read, which means it stores its schema in the metadata of the file. This allows Avro to handle schema evolution quite well since each file is self-describing.

You can have different files with different schema versions coexisting in a data lake and a reader can read the data based on the schema that is attached to it.

When a schema evolves, Avro uses a set of resolution rules to resolve schema differences between the reader's expected schema and the writer's schema, allowing backward and forward compatibility.

On the other hand, Parquet, a columnar storage format, stores the schema in the file footer. It also supports schema evolution to an extent. You can add new columns to the end of the structure, but you cannot delete or modify existing columns.

So, it's important to design your Parquet schema with future evolution in mind. Also, when querying Parquet files with evolved schemas, be mindful that some engines might not fully support all aspects of schema evolution, which can lead to issues.

To effectively manage schema evolution in a data lake, I would adopt a few strategies:

• Schema Registry: Implement a central schema registry that maintains all versions of the schema. This would serve as a single source of truth about the data schema for all consumers.

• Versioning: Incorporate versioning in the schema design. This would allow readers to know what version of the schema they are dealing with and handle it appropriately.

• Compatibility Checks: Regularly perform compatibility checks. This ensures that new schema changes are compatible with older versions. For example, using Avro's compatibility checks can help ensure backward or forward compatibility.

• Documentation: Keep robust documentation of all schema changes. This aids in data discovery and understanding, particularly for new team members or different data consumers.

• Tooling: Use tools that can handle schema evolution well. For instance, using a computational framework like Apache Beam can help manage schema evolution as it has built-in support for Avro and Parquet, and it can handle differences in schema during the processing stage.

Why is this answer good?

• Technical Depth: The answer shows a deep understanding of Parquet and Avro and how they handle schema evolution.

• Strategic Approach: The candidate outlines a comprehensive strategy for managing schema evolution in a data lake.

• Practical Solutions: Real-world solutions like using a schema registry, versioning, and compatibility checks are suggested.

• Consideration of Tooling: Mention of Apache Beam shows awareness of tools that can aid in managing schema evolution.

Suggested: Data Engineer skills and responsibilities in 2023

Could you explain the process of normalizing a database and the trade-offs involved with different normal forms?

Why is this question asked?

Your interviewer wants to evaluate your understanding of database normalization, a fundamental concept in relational database design.

Your knowledge of different normal forms, their benefits, and trade-offs associated with each can indicate your proficiency in designing efficient, reliable, and consistent databases.

Example answer:

Database normalization is a systematic approach to designing relational database schemas to minimize data redundancy and prevent problems like update anomalies, while enhancing the integrity and consistency of the data.

It involves structuring a database in accordance with a series of so-called "normal forms" that serve as rules or guidelines.

There are several levels of normalization, each referred to as a "normal form". The main normal forms, which are progressive, are the first (1NF), second (2NF), third (3NF), Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF), fourth (4NF), and fifth (5NF).

Each normal form has a specific set of requirements that the database schema must meet.

1NF requires eliminating duplicate columns from the same table and creating separate tables for each group of related data, identifying each row with a unique, non-null primary key.

2NF requires meeting all the rules of 1NF and removing subsets of data that apply to multiple rows of a table and placing them in separate tables, thereby establishing relationships between these new tables and their predecessors through the use of foreign keys.

3NF takes it a step further by ensuring that non-prime attributes (attributes that are not part of any candidate key) are dependent on the primary key, not on other non-prime attributes. This further reduces redundancy and dependencies.

BCNF is a stronger version of 3NF and deals with certain types of anomalies that are not handled by 3NF.

4NF and 5NF deal with multi-valued dependencies and join dependencies, respectively, but are less commonly used in practice.

While normalization aims to reduce data redundancy and improve data integrity, there are trade-offs involved with each level of normalization.

As we move to higher normal forms, data redundancy decreases, leading to potential space savings and increased data integrity.

However, this usually results in a larger number of tables, making queries and database management more complex. Performance can be impacted, as joining multiple tables is usually more costly than reading from a denormalized table.

Also, normalized databases might not be suitable for certain types of queries or reporting needs that require a lot of data to be aggregated - in these cases, a denormalized schema might be more efficient.

Again, as with a lot of these things, the extent of normalization really depends on the specific application requirements. The ideal case is one where we balance data integrity and efficiency.

Why is this answer good?

• Comprehensive Explanation: The answer covers all primary normal forms and the process of normalization.

• Understanding of Trade-offs: The candidate shows a good understanding of the potential downsides and performance trade-offs associated with normalization.

• Practical Application: The response shows the candidate’s ability to apply normalization theory to real-world scenarios.

• Balanced Perspective: The answer acknowledges that while normalization is valuable, the extent of its application depends on the specific requirements of the system.

Suggested: How To Match Your Resume To A Job Description?

In your opinion, how does the CAP theorem affect the design of large distributed databases? How can eventual consistency be managed?

Why is this question asked?

The interviewer is gauging your understanding of the fundamental trade-offs in distributed database design.

The CAP theorem is a central concept in this field. Your ability to explain its implications and manage eventual consistency shows your capacity to make informed decisions when designing and managing distributed systems.

Example answer:

The CAP theorem, proposed by computer scientist Eric Brewer, is a concept that asserts a distributed data store can only guarantee two of the three following properties: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance.

This theorem fundamentally influences the design of large distributed databases.

Let's define these terms first. Consistency means that every read receives the most recent write or an error. Availability ensures that every request receives a non-error response, without the guarantee that it contains the most recent write.

Partition Tolerance implies the system continues to operate despite arbitrary message loss or failure of part of the system.

When we are designing a large distributed database, we need to consider which two aspects are most crucial for our application.

If we are developing a banking system where consistency is vital, we might choose CP (Consistency and Partition Tolerance) at the expense of availability.

On the other hand, for a social media application where availability is paramount, we might opt for AP (Availability and Partition Tolerance), sacrificing some level of consistency.

Managing eventual consistency in distributed systems where AP is chosen is a common challenge. Eventual consistency means that if no new updates are made to a given data item, eventually all accesses to that item will return the last updated value.

It's a model that allows for temporary inconsistencies between replicas.

There are a few strategies to manage eventual consistency. One approach is Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs), which allow multiple replicas to be updated independently and concurrently, resolving conflicts deterministically.

Another approach is the use of version vectors or vector clocks to keep track of updates, ensuring that all changes are eventually propagated to all nodes.

This approach involves assigning a logical timestamp to each write operation, helping to establish a partial order of operations and resolve conflicts.

Also, read and write quorum policies can be implemented where reads and writes are performed on a certain number of node replicas before the operation is considered successful. This technique enhances data availability and consistency.

Additionally, reconciliation processes can be periodically run to identify and resolve inconsistencies, ensuring the system eventually reaches a consistent state.

Each of these strategies has its trade-offs, and the choice among them depends on specific application requirements and the nature of the data being managed.

Why is this answer good?

• Detailed Understanding: The answer demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the CAP theorem and its implications for distributed database design.

• Clarity of Explanation: The explanation is clear, with definitions of key terms and concrete examples.

• Strategies Discussed: The answer offers multiple strategies for managing eventual consistency, indicating a practical understanding of the subject.

• Understanding of Trade-offs: The candidate acknowledges that different strategies have trade-offs and should be chosen based on specific application requirements.

Suggested: 11 Resume Mistakes That Every Recruiter Notices

Can you describe a time when you had to choose between different database systems for a specific application? What factors did you consider in your decision?

Why is this question asked?

The interviewer wants to understand your experience and decision-making abilities when it comes to database selection.

The idea is to find out how you consider various factors like the nature of the data, scalability, performance, cost, and specific application requirements when making such critical decisions.

Example answer:

In one of my previous roles, I was tasked with the responsibility of choosing an appropriate database for a large-scale IoT-based project.

The system was expected to capture and process a high volume of time-series data from thousands of IoT sensors scattered across different locations.

The key requirements were high write and read throughput, efficient storage of time-series data, data compression capabilities, and support for complex queries.

Given the nature of the time-series data and the scale at which we were operating, my initial options were narrowed down to two - a traditional relational database management system (RDBMS) like PostgreSQL, or a time-series database like InfluxDB.

PostgreSQL, with its time-series extension TimescaleDB, was a good contender. It provided reliable ACID transactions and a familiar SQL interface for complex queries.

However, I was aware that while PostgreSQL could handle the job, it might not do so as efficiently as a specialized time-series database when the scale of data grows significantly.

On the other hand, InfluxDB, designed specifically for handling time-series data at a large scale, offered high write and read throughput, data compression, and time-centric functions. However, it did not support complex queries as well as PostgreSQL.

To make an informed decision, I evaluated both options against several criteria.

• Performance: I benchmarked both databases using simulated data and found that InfluxDB outperformed PostgreSQL in write-intensive scenarios.

• Scalability: InfluxDB was easier to scale out, a critical factor given the expected growth of our IoT network.

• Data Model: InfluxDB's time-series data model was more suitable for our use case than PostgreSQL's relational model.

• Query Language: PostgreSQL, with its SQL support, was superior. However, since our application did not require highly complex queries, InfluxDB's InfluxQL and Flux were sufficient.

• Cost: Both had open-source versions, but based on our needs and the resources used during the benchmarking, InfluxDB offered a more cost-effective solution.

After weighing these factors, I decided to proceed with InfluxDB. It was a tough decision, but InfluxDB's performance, scalability, and cost-effectiveness outweighed PostgreSQL's advantages for our specific use case.

This experience taught me the importance of understanding the specific needs of the application and evaluating options against those needs rather than relying on general evaluations of technology.

Why is this answer good?

• Real-World Experience: The candidate shares relevant real-world experience, demonstrating the required knowledge and skills.

• Comprehensive Evaluation: The candidate provides a comprehensive evaluation process, considering various critical factors.

• Decision Justification: The reasoning behind the final decision is well-articulated, showing that the choice was informed and well-thought-out.

• Reflective: The candidate shares what they learned from the experience, demonstrating a growth mindset.

Suggested: How to communicate amazingly as a remote worker?

Describe a complex data pipeline you've built from end to end. What were the biggest challenges, and how did you overcome them?

Why is this question asked?

This is all about your practical experience in designing and implementing complex data pipelines. It allows the interviewer to understand your problem-solving skills, familiarity with various tools, and ability to overcome challenges.

Example answer:

In my previous role, I was responsible for designing and implementing an end-to-end data pipeline for a customer recommendation system for an e-commerce platform.

The pipeline was meant to collect user behavior data, process it, and feed it to a machine-learning model for making personalized product recommendations.

Firstly, I used Apache Kafka as the data ingestion tool. Kafka is great for streaming high-velocity data and allowed us to process incoming user behavior data in real time.

Post ingestion, Apache Spark was used for processing and transforming data. Here, I wrote several Spark jobs for cleaning the data and creating user profiles and product vectors.

The data included several features, such as user's past purchases, clicked products, search history, and demographic details.

The processed data was then stored in Amazon Redshift, a columnar data warehouse, chosen for its ability to handle analytical queries efficiently. We structured the data in a star schema for simplicity and performance.

For the Machine Learning component, we used PySpark's MLlib library to train a collaborative filtering model using Alternating Least Squares (ALS). The model was periodically retrained with new data.

Finally, I used Airflow for orchestration. Airflow managed the entire workflow, ensured dependencies were met, and the pipeline was resilient to failures.

The biggest challenges we faced included ensuring data quality and managing pipeline failures. Initially, the raw data was plagued with missing values and inconsistencies, which led to poor quality recommendations.

To counter this, I implemented robust data cleaning and validation stages in Spark, including handling of missing values, inconsistent string formats, and outliers.

Managing pipeline failures was another major challenge due to network issues, data load, or unhandled exceptions in the Spark jobs. I tackled this by implementing thorough error handling and logging mechanisms across the pipeline.

Additionally, Airflow's in-built retry and alert mechanisms ensured that the team was alerted in case of persistent failures, and the failed tasks were automatically retried.

The pipeline significantly improved the platform's ability to offer personalized product recommendations, resulting in increased customer engagement and conversion rates.

Why is this answer good?

• Detailed Description: The candidate gives a detailed description of the data pipeline, demonstrating deep technical knowledge and practical experience.

• Problem-Solving: The candidate clearly explains the challenges faced and how they were addressed, showcasing their problem-solving skills.

• Impact Assessment: The candidate describes the impact of their solution, revealing an understanding of business outcomes.

• Use of Technology: The answer demonstrates the candidate's proficiency with a wide range of technologies and tools relevant to data engineering.

Suggested: 10 Seriously Underrated Remote Work Skills

Tell us about a situation where you had to optimize the performance of a large database. What approach did you take, and what was the outcome?

Why is this question asked?

The intention here is to understand your practical experience with database performance optimization.

It’ll allow the interviewer to evaluate your analytical skills, knowledge of database systems, understanding of optimization techniques, and impact on system performance.

Example answer:

In one of my previous roles, I faced a challenge with a MySQL database that was experiencing performance issues due to the growing scale of our application. Queries were running slow, causing delays in data retrieval and affecting the overall user experience of our application.

My first step was to identify the root cause. I used the MySQL "EXPLAIN" statement to analyze our most common queries. This helped me understand how these queries were being processed and why they were slow.

I found that some of the complex queries were doing full table scans due to a lack of appropriate indexes.

To address this, I created indexes on columns that were frequently used in WHERE clauses. However, I was careful not to over-index, as this could negatively impact write operations.

Next, I noticed that some JOIN operations were inefficient because they involved large datasets. I decided to denormalize some of our data to reduce the need for these expensive JOIN operations.

This also involved making changes at the application level to ensure data consistency.

Additionally, I implemented query caching using MySQL's query cache, which stores the result set of a query, so if the same query is requested again, it can be served from the cache. This significantly improved the response time of frequent read operations.

I also turned to hardware improvements as a part of the solution. We upgraded our server to have more RAM, which allowed for larger buffer pools, speeding up the read operations as more data could be cached.

Lastly, I worked closely with the development team to optimize their SQL queries, helping them understand how certain changes could affect database performance.

After these optimizations, we observed a significant improvement in database performance. Query response times reduced by around 70%, and the database was able to handle a larger volume of simultaneous requests without slowing down.

This had a direct positive impact on the user experience of our application, as data retrieval became noticeably faster.

Why is this answer good?

• Problem-Solving Approach: The candidate displays a structured problem-solving approach, diagnosing the issue, and implementing appropriate solutions.

• Technical Knowledge: The answer demonstrates an in-depth understanding of database systems and optimization techniques.

• Collaboration Skills: The candidate shows their ability to work with other teams, illustrating good collaboration skills.

• Impact Measurement: The candidate quantifies the improvement, showing they understand the importance of tracking and measuring the impact of their work.

Suggested: Data Engineer Interview Questions That Recruiters Actually Ask

Conclusion:

There you have it — 10 important Senior Data Engineer interview questions. The reason we’ve gone with just ten is because we’ve also answered quite a few simpler, smaller questions within these more elaborate answers. This simply prevents you from reading the same questions again and again.

We expect the content in this article to form a significant part of your technical interview. Use it as a guide and amazing jobs shouldn’t be too far away.

On that front, if you’re already looking for Senior Data Engineer jobs, check out Simple Job Listings. We only list verified, fully-remote jobs that pay really well. For context, the average salary for Senior Data Engineers on our job board is $156,000.

The best part? Most jobs that we post aren’t listed anywhere else.

Visit Simple Job Listings and find amazing remote Senior Data Engineer jobs. Good luck!